Published: January 2026 | By Stevie Morris
Negative keywords are more important now than they've ever been.
If you're running Google Ads and not actively managing negative keywords, you're bleeding budget. Accounts with significant spend are wasting hundreds, if not thousands, every month on completely irrelevant traffic.
Here's why this problem has gotten worse, and what you can do about it.
1. The Core Problem: Google's Business Model
3. Performance Max Makes This Worse
5. The Financial Impact (Real Numbers)
7. My Approach to Negative Keywords
8. Action Steps You Can Take This Week
Google is a business. Their goal is to show your ads to a wider audience.
Unless you have significant data already, they're making their best guess at who will convert.
And they get it wrong. A lot.
That costs you money.
Google's incentive is to show your ads as broadly as possible. More impressions, more clicks, more revenue for them. Your incentive is to show ads only to people likely to convert. These incentives don't align.
That's where negative keywords come in. They're your control mechanism to prevent Google from showing your ads for irrelevant searches.
Here's the best way to understand negative keywords:
Google Ads is gambling. Each search term has odds.
The closer the search term is to your intent, the better the odds of conversion.
Good Odds:
These have clear intent. Someone is actively looking for what you offer in your location.
Terrible Odds:
These searches have clear intent too - but not for YOUR service. They're looking for someone else, free information, or DIY solutions.
But your ad still shows. And you pay a premium CPC for that click.
Without negative keywords, you're taking bets with terrible odds all day long.

Performance Max is a black box.
You have little control over where it spends. And if given the chance, it will eat your entire budget.
It can work well for audience discovery in some markets. But it's not suitable for all advertisers.
The biggest mistake I see? No brand exclusions.
When Performance Max is your main driver, it goes for the easiest conversions - your brand terms.
It steals conversions you would have got anyway instead of finding new customers.
Think about it:
But they were going to buy anyway. You just paid for a conversion you would have got organically or through a cheaper brand campaign.
The Solution: Add your brand terms as negative keywords in Performance Max campaigns. Force it to find NEW customers, not steal existing ones.

This is one of the most expensive wastes I see.
Search for "window companies" and Google will show your ad for hundreds of competitor names in your area.
Same with:
You're bidding on every local business name that matches your category and location.
These clicks are expensive. You're paying premium CPCs for completely irrelevant traffic.
Why premium CPCs? Because:
1. The competitor might be bidding on their own brand (high competition)
2. Google sees these as commercial searches (higher value = higher cost)
3. You have low Quality Score (your ad isn't relevant to their brand)
I recently analysed a doors campaign for a client. They were showing for:
These are all competitors. Every impression wasted. Every click expensive and useless.
Potential savings from excluding competitor brands: £50-100 per month on one small campaign.

Let me be specific about what this costs.
Accounts with significant spend are wasting hundreds, if not thousands, every month on irrelevant traffic without proper negative keywords.
I just analysed a doors campaign for a UK window and door installer.
What I found:
Financial impact:
That's one small campaign.
Scale that across an entire account? The waste adds up fast.
From accounts I've audited:
Small accounts (£500-2,000/month spend):
Medium accounts (£2,000-10,000/month spend):
Large accounts (£10,000+/month spend):
These are conservative estimates. I've seen worse.
If negative keywords save this much money, why don't people use them?
Most professional PPC people have negatives as part of their workflow.
But in-house teams? That's where the problem is.
Often an employee is seconded to manage Google Ads without any real interest in it. It's just another task on top of their actual job.
They do the minimum to avoid being questioned.
Negative keywords are:
So they get skipped.
In-house marketers managing Google Ads often:
The result? Accounts bleeding money on irrelevant traffic.
Here's how I handle negative keywords for clients:
I use tools and data to identify bad search terms before they waste budget.
This includes:
Most people add negatives AFTER wasting money. I build lists before launch:
Before launching a campaign:
Ongoing discipline:
I use shared negative keyword lists applied across all campaigns:
This ensures consistency and saves time.
It's not complicated. It's just disciplined.
And it saves clients hundreds every month.

If you're running Google Ads, here's what to do this week:
Go to Google Ads > Campaigns > Insights and Reports > Search Terms
Look at the last 30 days of search terms across all campaigns.
Look for:
Open a spreadsheet and categorize:
High Priority (Add Immediately):
Medium Priority (Add This Week):
Monitor:
Two ways to do this:
Option 1: Campaign Level
Add negatives directly to individual campaigns. Use this for campaign-specific exclusions.
Option 2: Shared Negative Lists (Better)
Create shared negative keyword lists and apply them across all campaigns. Much more efficient.
Specifically for Performance Max:
Do you have brand exclusions?
If not, add your brand terms as negative keywords. Force Performance Max to find NEW customers, not steal existing ones.
Add a weekly or monthly recurring task:
Make it part of your workflow, not a one-time task.
If you're running Google Ads and not actively managing negative keywords, you're bleeding budget.
The problem has gotten worse with Performance Max, broad match changes, and Google's push toward automation.
But the solution is simple:
Review your search terms this week.
Look for competitor names. Look for irrelevant categories. Look for what Performance Max is actually bidding on.
Add negatives. Save money. Improve ROAS.
It's the easiest win in PPC right now.
I'm Stevie Morris. I've been managing Google Ads accounts for 12 years, specializing in ecommerce and B2C lead generation.
If your Google Ads account is wasting budget on irrelevant traffic, I can help.
[Get in touch here] → [Contact link]
Last updated: January 2026
PPC Consultant Involved in online marketing for the last 25 years first with SEO , Web Development and now for the last 12 years focusing on PPC & Google Ads
